| The Ohio Schools are redefining their Special | | | | strategies for improvement: |
| Education program and closing the gap in the | | | | • Redefine special education at the state |
| achievement of students with disabilities. The Ohio | | | | level to shift focus away from compliance and |
| schools believe that achievement gaps are not | | | | paperwork to standards-based instruction for all |
| the same as ability gaps, and the education | | | | children. |
| system is responsible for ensuring that high | | | | • Implement a statewide monitoring |
| achievement is an attainable goal for all students. | | | | system designed to assess district/educational |
| Furthermore, the Ohio schools has put forth that | | | | compliance with federal and state law applicable to |
| meaningful participation of students with disabilities | | | | students with disabilities. |
| in state assessment is absolutely essential if | | | | • Align the work of the Special Education |
| every child is to be assured access to challenging | | | | Regional Resource Center (SERRC) network with |
| curriculum and appropriate instruction. | | | | the priorities of the Ohio schools, including No Child |
| In 2001, the Ohio schools made a major shift in | | | | Left Behind, differentiating instruction, positive |
| approaching students with disabilities by revising | | | | behavior support, reading/literacy, and progress |
| school policy to require students with disabilities to | | | | monitoring. |
| participate in state assessment. Now, content | | | | • Maximize use of federal and state |
| standards are the focus of instruction for all | | | | funds earmarked for children with disabilities. |
| students in every classroom, and a variety of | | | | • Develop and disseminate products, |
| research-based instructional strategies are aligned | | | | tools and services focused on improving results |
| with the content standards. A coherent array of | | | | for student who are at risk, including students |
| interventions, supports and services are used to | | | | with disabilities. |
| ensure the success of students with disabilities. | | | | • Use the accountability system to |
| The policy now is that assessment is a reflection | | | | leverage change in policy and practice at the local |
| of instruction and instruction is a reflection of | | | | school level. |
| assessment, creating a shared responsibility for | | | | The Ohio schools are focusing attention and |
| the education of students with disabilities. | | | | energy on assisting all students to achieve high |
| The Ohio schools' goals for teaching students with | | | | academic standards. They are preparing and |
| disabilities are standards, capacity, and | | | | supporting teachers and administrators to ensure |
| accountability. They will improve access to, | | | | that all students are taught what they need in |
| participation in, and progress in the general | | | | order to succeed. They are adapting the public |
| curriculum, based on the Ohio academic standards, | | | | education structure in a manner to ensure all |
| for students with disabilities. Encouraging others to | | | | students will learn the Ohio schools' academic |
| consider students with disabilities as general | | | | standards. |
| education children first is the capacity goal - | | | | This means fewer but more meaningful goals for |
| assuming they will achieve, rather than assuming | | | | all students, effective use of student assessment |
| they may not achieve. The goal of accountability | | | | data and resources, a fundamental shift in focus |
| is to increase the performance of children with | | | | from what is taught to what children learn, and |
| disabilities on state and district assessments from | | | | allowing assessment to drive classroom |
| which they previously have been exempt. | | | | instruction, which is rigorous and aligned to the |
| The Ohio schools developed the following | | | | standards. |