Tough Love Approach Keeps Fad Dieting Going

Increasing numbers of waiting list patients areand deeper into the denial of erstwhile civil
now being forced to slim before being allowed toliberties, is a major stepping-up of these
have routine operations on the British Nationalinstitutionalised pressures.
Health Service.Some would also argue that the extension of
A newspaper investigation claims that the localisedpublic health care intervention into wider and wider
policy is now to be rolled out nationally by the endaspects of modern living is not so much a
of 2007.wellbeing aspiration as a symptom of the current
Doctors will allocate treatment to patientswestern governmental drift towards an increasing
according to their Body Mass Index, the BMI beingmicromanagement of the whole lifestyle.
the formula relating putative optimum weight toThis is not necessarily a claim either of the left or
height.the right, as both perspectives would be critical of
If people have a BMI over 30, which isan excessively big state overriding basic liberties.
commonplace in the UK and very much towardsThe problem with all of this in relation to the
the average zone in the US, they will be deniedoverweight arena is that it is leaving those already
non-emergency operations such as hip and kneeinvolved in failed fad dieting with nowhere to turn
surgery, or procedures including IVF treatment.except straight back into more fad dieting.
The new guidelines already apply to about 1 in 15Gradual lifestyle adjustments, new coping
of the PCTs in the UK and, when implementedstrategies for the emotional stresses which
nationally, the BMI-rule will affect about 1 in 5 oftrigger overeating, a relaxed appreciation of the
the population. Failure to achieve the threshold forcultural drivers towards fad dieting cycles and the
operations will result in being recommended afostering of a choice to move in fresh directions
crash slimming regime and reassessment after sixall of these healthful options are blown away by
months.the official decrees to lose weight fast. In the
Health officials state that their rationale behind theabsence of alternatives, what are people to do
strict new qualification for treatment is justified byexcept to plunge back into the fad dieting
research which shows that slimmer people havemainstream?
better recovery rates from surgery. WhateverGovernment, unchallenged, is always going to be
the proven scientific case for this viewpoint andrelatively short term in its outlook; it is simply the
also not forgetting the debatable validity of theway that it tends to work.
now 150 year old BMI standpoint, a consideredThe short termism in this instance is exacerbating
critique reveals troubling implications within thisthe very issues it is seeking to address. The
clampdown.macho tough love approach will do little except
One of the central paradoxes of the currentdeliver tough luck on those problem dieters who
major debate surrounding obesity is the questionnow have less freedom than ever to break away
of why people persist in long term dieting cyclesfrom fad dieting.
when dieting is increasingly discredited as anThis is another expression of the growing yet
effective means of lasting weight control.implicit official view that the overweight are
It can be argued that individuals are being drivendeviants who must be brought back within the
into fad dieting not so much by the long standingcorrect moral line. Is this fair or accurate?
notion of Yo Yo Dieting (itself, we would contend,With the overweight in the UK now being banned
simpliste and flawed) but rather by overwhelmingfrom some surgical operations unless they crash
institutionalised and cultural pressures. From thisdiet, weight control charity The Weight Foundation
perspective, the creeping criminalisation ofdiscusses the growing stigmatization of obesity.
overweight, which is advancing steadily deeper