RVUs- Whose Value Is It, Anyway?

As I discuss career options with a group of thirdsuccumb to modesty and self-effacement? Do
year medical students, I imagine a marketingpsychiatrists have so great a level of job
brochure for psychiatry residencies in a world ofsatisfaction that they don't worry about money? I
mental health parity:wonder if the difference reflects a much larger
The brain is undeniably the most complex organproblem-- that psychiatrists have bought into a
of the human body. Treatments for diseases ofsocietal impression that mental health is less
the mind and brain require the intricatevaluable than physical health.
understanding of chemistry, physiology, andSupport for this last concern can be found when
anatomy common to all branches of medicine, asone looks at the funding of mental health services
well as the ability to step outside of oneself toin general, and the tacit acceptance of the funding
objectively observe personality and emotion. Thesituation by psychiatrists and other mental health
psychiatrist must tolerate the unsettlingcaregivers. My insurer is required by statute to
awareness of the mysterious relationshipprovide coverage for mental health services up to
between mind and matter, and must help othersabout $2000 per year. On the other hand, there
find their own answers to the mysteries of theis no limit on payment for orthopedic injuries. The
human condition. No wonder that the masters ofinsured alcoholic is covered for the $1800
medicine-those who work in the vast field ofsurgeon's fee for a fractured kneecap- and more
interventional psychiatry-are so valued by society.for the incidental hospital bill and the bills for
The time has come for my transition fromphysical therapy. If the alcoholic strikes his head,
psychiatric residency to psychiatric practice. Thethe radiologist receives $1200 to look at the MRI.
prospect of six-figure incomes suggests reward,And if he abruptly stops drinking for a week, the
at last, for years of work and debt. For thehospital is paid tens of thousands of dollars to help
employers, under the guarantee of income andhim through withdrawal-- only to turn him out to
benefits lies the expectation of productivity. Thisdrink again. Yet to treat the primary alcoholism,
productivity is not measured by patientthe insurer will pay$2000. And if the patient has
satisfaction, symptom improvement, or reducedspent $2000 for treatment of depression earlier in
morbidity. Rather the name of the game is thethe year, the insurer will continue to pay for
RVU, and the way to get more RVUs is to seekneecap fractures and MRIs, but not for
more patients in whatever time is available. I amtreatment of the underlying cause of these
grateful for the opportunity to earn good moneyinjuries-alcoholism. And other comparisons are
in the service of a challenging and rewardingequally dramatic. My insurer will pay $70,000 or
career. But I am also aware of the strikingmore for cardiac bypass to reduce a person's risk
difference between the salaries of psychiatristsof a heart attack, but only $2000 per year for
and the salaries of many other physicians. As atreatment of the same person's depression, to
former practitioner of one of medicine's morereduce risk of suicide. The narcotic addict is
lucrative specialties, I find myself comparing myallowed $2000 for treatment of heroin addiction,
apparent value now with my value then. Why isvs. hundreds of thousands of dollars for a
my work now worth less than half as much assecondary HIV infection.
my work as an anesthesiologist?The relatively low payments received by
At the end of a night in the crisis service lastpsychiatrists can be blamed to some extent on
week I walked past a group of patients huddled inpsychiatrists themselves. They accept their own
the cold, waiting for the doors of the walk-in clinicdevaluation when they sign for lower salaries or
to open. As I looked at their tired faces, I realizedwhen they accept limitations on their ability to
the desperation they must feel to leave homespractice psychotherapy. They allow administrators
or homeless shelters at such a cold and earlyand others without medical training to dictate
hour, and make the trek to the clinic by foot ortreatment plans. I am reminded of the late 1980's
by bus. Their pains were certainly as great as thewhen anesthesia was becoming perceived as a
pains of any of my patients presenting fortechnical trade, and was challenged by the
surgery. But for some reason there is lessexpanding statutory roles of nurse anesthetists.
outrage over their lack of care than would be theRather than narrowing anesthesiology, the answer
case for a group of patients with untreatedto devaluation was found by moving into critical
diabetes, appendicitis, or heart disease standingcare and pain medicine and asserting the roles of
outside a hospital. I realized that like many inanesthesiologists as physicians. Similarly,
society, I had unwittingly accepted the scenecardiologists did themselves and their patients well
before me as adequate care for the mentally ill.when they laid claim to angioplasty, and called
The RBRVS, or resource-based relative valuethemselves interventional'. The new technology
scale, was instituted by Medicare in 1992 in anbrought public respect and money, which then
attempt to standardize payments for physicianyielded an explosion of new treatments. I don't
services. Relative value units, or RVU's, areknow what the parallel path for psychiatrists will
assigned to physician services based on threebe, but it is vital that as insights develop into brain
main factors: physician work, practice expenses,function, psychiatrists lay claim to them, grasp
and the cost of liability insurance. Physician work isthem, and never let them go. There is nothing like
determined by several factors including timea brain procedure to grab society's interest and
required for the service, the technical skill andrespect. In fact, I posit that the simple adoption
physical effort, the mental effort and judgment,of the term Interventional Psychiatry' would
and the amount of stress experienced by theincrease the funding of psychiatrists and
physician due to the risk to the patient. To arrivepsychiatric research by 20%.
at the fair value' of services, the number ofThe low priority of mental health services to
relative value units is multiplied by a universal dollarsociety is, of course, a complex issue. Stigma,
value, and adjusted slightly for practice locationlack of lobbying resources, and denial of the
according to regional cost of living indices.impact of mental illness certainly play roles in the
In theory, this approach to payment provides alack of public interest and investment in mental
level playing field for physicians. Payments for ahealth. Resources are thin for the unemployed and
cholecystectomy, for example, reflect theuninsured mentally ill, and the field of psychiatry
fortitude one must have to cut into someone'sdeserves kudos for attempting to meet the
body and the time required for surgery andneeds of this population in return for little financial
postoperative care. Medicare strictly adheres togain. But for patients with resources, we must
this formula, but in the world of private insurancerecognize and advocate that mental health care is
some physicians' relative value units are moreas important as treatment for a torn ACL, and
valuable than others. In my region, for example,deserves equitable reimbursement. The abilities to
Medicare has decided that the relative value of alaugh, to work, and to love are as vital as the
unit of physician work is about $38. The largestability to return to beach volleyball. Psychiatrists
third-party payer in the area will pay psychiatrists,must realize that at some point, expectations of
pediatricians, or family physicians about $50 perrelatively low reimbursements and medical
value unit. But orthopedists and radiologists, orstanding become self-fulfilling prophecies, as our
podiatrists providing orthopedic services, are paidsociety tends to value those most who value
$100 per value unit.themselves. The correction of societal bias and
What accounts for the difference in payment? Ifthe resultant devaluation of our services will
not due to stress, physical or mental effort, risk,require constant efforts to educate, negotiate,
technical proficiency, or practice cost, where doesand assert the value of mental health care in a
the difference come from? Certainly not fromhealthy society. And psychiatrists, as the voices,
supply and demand, as in my area it is muchfaces, and business representatives of mental
easier to see an orthopedist this week than tohealth, will raise the status and treatment of their
see a psychiatrist within the next month. Doespatients as they work to raise the scientific, and
the lower reimbursement reflect decades of pooryes, economic, status of themselves as
negotiating? Are psychiatrists more likely tophysicians.