Fbi Raids: Pertinent Or Paranoid?

Business always moves faster than government ...that any releases issued by the investigating
It's no surprise that a great deal of lawmakers'authorities have always been very specific in their
time is spent reacting to advances in commercenature, because major banks have enough
and science. It's also no surprise that one of theirfinancial and political clout to strike back at
favorite tactics is to call on their enforcementanything less.
agencies to bring scrutiny against any topic aboutAn example of a precisely identified transgression
which they're struggling to understand.is the Citigroup private banking scandal in Tokyo in
We're now seeing this applied against at least two2004. The Japanese authorities said the bank
e-currency operations.helped clients manipulate accounting records
One of them, INT Gold, saw their head offices inthrough improper real estate transactions, failed
Texas raided by the FBI in December. No arreststo process tax refunds for clients and
were made and no disclosures were presented tomismanaged customers' confidential information.
indicate the reason for their actions. The onlyAs a result, they ordered Citigroup's Japanese
auspices mentioned were that they were pursuingprivate banking operations to close, but took
an ongoing fraud investigation. It's now been overmeasures to ensure all unaffected investors
a month and nothing further has happened.would be minimally affected while they moved
At roughly the same time, e-Gold was alsotheir accounts.
served with a search warrant. It seems theRarely, total loss to depositors happens. The
justification was petty --- they allegedly didn'tSilverado collapse in Colorado sent Charles Keating
have a 'required' currency-exchange license --- andto prison for what should be a thousand life
they were upset enough to place the followingterms, as more people than that lost their life
posting on their website:e-gold(R) welcomes USsavings. It's notable that this occurred in what
Government review of its status as a privatelywas a laissez-faire junk bond scenario.
issued currency January 20, 2006Raids only receive mention when it serves the
"Starting in mid-December 2005, Gold & Silverauthorities' purposes to do so. One reason for this
Reserve, Inc. (G&SR), contractual Operator andis because the searches and/or seizures don't
primary dealer for e-gold, has been the subject ofyield sufficient results to merit charges being filed.
a warranted search of its premises and records,There can exist a vast gray area in modern
had its domestic bank accounts frozen, and beenfinancial activities, and when the fine print of a
the target of a precisely timed, extraordinarilycertain situation is scrutinized, it often occurs that,
misleading attack by a major business publication.perhaps those activities have sailed close to the
"In an emergency hearing in US District Courtlegal wind, but they did not take the airs of
January 13, 2006, the freeze order on G&SR'sdisrepute.
bank accounts was lifted. Though numerousIt remains to be seen what they're investigating
criminal claims had been made in obtaining theat INT Gold. As opposed to their treatment of
search and seizure warrants, the Government hasmajor banks, the nature of the authorities'
not sustained these allegations and the onlyannouncement of this raid was quite vague, which
remaining claim is a contention that G&SR hasI'm sure was by design. So, the issue is one of
operated as a currency exchange without thewhom they were attempting to stir. However,
proper license. G&SR had previously proposed toAmerican law says the parties involved are
the Government that e-gold be classified forinnocent until proven guilty, so they should duly be
regulatory purposes as a currency, enabling G&SRaccorded that right. Until the entire story comes
to register as a currency exchange. In a Treasuryto light, it's improper to cast aspersions. After all,
report released January 11, 2006, however, theas with most raids at major banks that go
Department of Treasury reaffirmed theirunpublicized, it may be that the transgressor is
interpretation of the USC and CFR definitions ofnot the company, but a client who has abused its
currency as excluding e-gold.privileges within that company's facilities.
"G&SR, for nearly a year, has been engaged withThe e-currency investigations are surely a result,
an agency of Treasury in a BSA (Bank Secrecyin part, of one government's indecision as to how
Act) compliance examination it had voluntarilyto regulate e-currencies within their borders when
initiated. G&SR, though preferring that the venuethose currencies are neither fiat nor necessarily
was not a courtroom, welcomes the opportunitydomiciled within those borders.
to extend its discussions with the Government onThis reminds me of broadcasting's early days,
how best to achieve appropriate statutory orwhen the Feds were perplexed about how to
regulatory cognizance of e-gold while continuing tobest cope with radio signals that only obeyed the
build e-gold's market share as a medium oflaws of physics and thus had the ability to cross
international commerce.state lines without governmental permission. As
"Despite the unfounded charges and adverseridiculous as that sounds today, the thought of a
misleading publicity that have severely damagedparticular technology being more advanced than
both e-gold and G&SR, G&SR has continued topolitical and/or geographical delineations was of
meet all financial obligations and remain completelydeep concern to them. It ultimately took nearly 15
operational. e-gold remains highly committed to itsyears for the American government to create
goal of bringing, for the first time in history, tothe Federal Communications Commission to cope
people of any financial means across the globe, awith such an 'advanced' business as interstate
secure payment mechanism at a fraction of thebroadcasting.
cost of any other system. e-gold fully expects toGiven the fact that e-currencies are privately
transcend the unfortunate events of the pastgenerated and administered, and given that no
month and resume its exponential growth.central monitoring system exists to aid in their
"Further information can be found at:regulation, it is no surprise under the current
The proactive approach by e-Gold should beenvironment of American laws to now see a
applauded. INT Gold should have done the samebustle of authoritarian attention directed toward
thing.them. Until they are able to determine a palatable
If more of the public only knew how many timespolicy, the best they can do is assume a
search papers were served on financial institutionsself-righteous position in the interests of
for one reason or another, they'd no doubt be as'consumer protection' and cast aspersions by
skeptical as I am about the publicity themeans of rationalization. It's not particularly fair,
authorities have given their actions against thesebut as we've seen in related online forums, it's
two e-currency companies.quite effective.
Let's consider how authorities move against majorHopefully, the issue will be settled in a much more
banks when wrongdoing is suspected. Oneexpeditious manner than it was in broadcasting.
characteristic which becomes quickly evident is