FBI Raids: Pertinent or Paranoid?

Business always moves faster than government ...wrongdoing is suspected. One characteristic which
It's no surprise that a great deal of lawmakers'becomes quickly evident is that any releases
time is spent reacting to advances in commerceissued by the investigating authorities have always
and science. It's also no surprise that one of theirbeen very specific in their nature, because major
favorite tactics is to call on their enforcementbanks have enough financial and political clout to
agencies to bring scrutiny against any topic aboutstrike back at anything less. An example of a
which they're struggling to understand. We're nowprecisely identified transgression is the Citigroup
seeing this applied against at least two e-currencyprivate banking scandal in Tokyo in 2004. The
operations. One of them, INT Gold, saw theirJapanese authorities said the bank helped clients
head offices in Texas raided by the FBI inmanipulate accounting records through improper
December. No arrests were made and noreal estate transactions, failed to process tax
disclosures were presented to indicate the reasonrefunds for clients and mismanaged customers'
for their actions. The only auspices mentionedconfidential information. As a result, they ordered
were that they were pursuing an ongoing fraudCitigroup's Japanese private banking operations to
investigation. It's now been over a month andclose, but took measures to ensure all unaffected
nothing further has happened. At roughly theinvestors would be minimally affected while they
same time, e-Gold was also served with a searchmoved their accounts. Rarely, total loss to
warrant. It seems the justification was petty ---depositors happens. The Silverado collapse in
they allegedly didn't have a 'required'Colorado sent Charles Keating to prison for what
currency-exchange license --- and they wereshould be a thousand life terms, as more people
upset enough to place the following posting onthan that lost their life savings. It's notable that
their website: e-goldÂ(R) welcomes USthis occurred in what was a laissez-faire junk bond
Government review of its status as a privatelyscenario. Raids only receive mention when it
issued currency January 20, 2006 "Starting inserves the authorities' purposes to do so. One
mid-December 2005, Gold & Silver Reserve, Inc.reason for this is because the searches and/or
(G&SR), contractual Operator and primary dealerseizures don't yield sufficient results to merit
for e-gold, has been the subject of a warrantedcharges being filed. There can exist a vast gray
search of its premises and records, had itsarea in modern financial activities, and when the
domestic bank accounts frozen, and been thefine print of a certain situation is scrutinized, it
target of a precisely timed, extraordinarilyoften occurs that, perhaps those activities have
misleading attack by a major business publication.sailed close to the legal wind, but they did not
"In an emergency hearing in US District Courttake the airs of disrepute. It remains to be seen
January 13, 2006, the freeze order on G&SR'swhat they're investigating at INT Gold. As
bank accounts was lifted. Though numerousopposed to their treatment of major banks, the
criminal claims had been made in obtaining thenature of the authorities' announcement of this
search and seizure warrants, the Government hasraid was quite vague, which I'm sure was by
not sustained these allegations and the onlydesign. So, the issue is one of whom they were
remaining claim is a contention that G&SR hasattempting to stir. However, American law says
operated as a currency exchange without thethe parties involved are innocent until proven
proper license. G&SR had previously proposed toguilty, so they should duly be accorded that right.
the Government that e-gold be classified forUntil the entire story comes to light, it's improper
regulatory purposes as a currency, enabling G&SRto cast aspersions. After all, as with most raids at
to register as a currency exchange. In a Treasurymajor banks that go unpublicized, it may be that
report released January 11, 2006, however, thethe transgressor is not the company, but a client
Department of Treasury reaffirmed theirwho has abused its privileges within that
interpretation of the USC and CFR definitions ofcompany's facilities. The e-currency investigations
currency as excluding e-gold. "G&SR, for nearly aare surely a result, in part, of one government's
year, has been engaged with an agency ofindecision as to how to regulate e-currencies
Treasury in a BSA (Bank Secrecy Act)within their borders when those currencies are
compliance examination it had voluntarily initiated.neither fiat nor necessarily domiciled within those
G&SR, though preferring that the venue was notborders. This reminds me of broadcasting's early
a courtroom, welcomes the opportunity todays, when the Feds were perplexed about how
extend its discussions with the Government onto best cope with radio signals that only obeyed
how best to achieve appropriate statutory orthe laws of physics and thus had the ability to
regulatory cognizance of e-gold while continuing tocross state lines without governmental permission.
build e-gold's market share as a medium ofAs ridiculous as that sounds today, the thought of
international commerce. "Despite the unfoundeda particular technology being more advanced than
charges and adverse misleading publicity that havepolitical and/or geographical delineations was of
severely damaged both e-gold and G&SR, G&SRdeep concern to them. It ultimately took nearly 15
has continued to meet all financial obligations andyears for the American government to create
remain completely operational. e-gold remainsthe Federal Communications Commission to cope
highly committed to its goal of bringing, for thewith such an 'advanced' business as interstate
first time in history, to people of any financialbroadcasting. Given the fact that e-currencies are
means across the globe, a secure paymentprivately generated and administered, and given
mechanism at a fraction of the cost of any otherthat no central monitoring system exists to aid in
system. e-gold fully expects to transcend thetheir regulation, it is no surprise under the current
unfortunate events of the past month andenvironment of American laws to now see a
resume its exponential growth. "Furtherbustle of authoritarian attention directed toward
information can be found at: The proactivethem. Until they are able to determine a palatable
approach by e-Gold should be applauded. INT Goldpolicy, the best they can do is assume a
should have done the same thing. If more of theself-righteous position in the interests of
public only knew how many times search papers'consumer protection' and cast aspersions by
were served on financial institutions for onemeans of rationalization. It's not particularly fair,
reason or another, they'd no doubt be asbut as we've seen in related online forums, it's
skeptical as I am about the publicity thequite effective. Hopefully, the issue will be settled
authorities have given their actions against thesein a much more expeditious manner than it was in
two e-currency companies. Let's consider howbroadcasting.
authorities move against major banks when