India - Disaster Management Vs Real Estate- The Need to Upgrade Buildings of 2002 Vintage and Older

This may come as a rude shock to many, butvulnerability and therefore the need for stringent
the reality is that buildings designed andsafeguards.
constructed before 2002 do not even meet theHowever mere lip service on what should be done
minimum earthquake safety standards prescribedand followed would do little for the country to
by the Government. The Indian Seismic Buildingachieve greater earthquake resilience.
Code was last revised in the year 2002 afterAccountability should be the order of the day.
many valuable lessons were learned in theStringent legal provisions to enforce that at least
aftermath of the devastating Gujarat earthquakethe minimum safeguards must be followed. Public
of 26 Jan 2001. There were many a committeeawareness is required to be created through
set up to inquire into the lapses and suggestmass advertising so that they can then take the
remedial measures; many international agenciesnecessary steps to upgrade their buildings. The
pledged their support and the United Nationspresent day reality makes this a necessity.
contributed both monetarily and by providingToday the responsibility of the Builder/Developer
technical guidance. The Indian Seismic Codefinishes once the possession is handed over. The
underwent a stringent upgrade so that futureoccupants who are struggling to pay their housing
catastrophes could be averted. The loss of lifeinstallments are many times in no position to incur
and property was colossal and for some time thefurther expenditure on structural analysis
vast media coverage made one to believe thatevaluation and seismic retrofit. Even if the actual
this was the "final wake up call". As time passedretrofit costs are to be paid by the occupants the
the memories once again proved to be short livedbuilders should provide their existing engineering
and the "chatpatta" Bollywood news sold moreinfrastructure for seismic evaluation of the
and the mundane "Earthquake Safety" which wasbuildings constructed by them. Once the analysis is
easily ignored especially when it was asking thedone the occupants would then know the
people to do some thing which they have neverexpenditure required for upgrading the building to
done before, "protect themselves".the present earthquake standards.
The Government after great deliberationsIn many developed and developing countries
benchmarked "Life Safety" as the minimumwhich lie in the seismically active regions, Building
safety standard that all buildings must adhere to.Insurance is mandatory especially high-rise
Life safety implies that in case of a majorconstruction. The insurance companies pitch in
earthquake the total collapse of the building shouldwith quality control and ensure stringent
be prevented. This would help in minimizingsafeguards before they provide the required
casualties. After the earthquake, in case theinsurance cover. As an incentive, in case, higher
damage to the building was above a thresholdthan the minimum safety standards are followed,
level it could be demolished and rebuilt.the insurance premium becomes less, and in cases
Approximately 59% of the country is vulnerablewhere even the minimum safeguards are not
to earthquakes. The recent seismic activity in theadhered to, the building simply does not get
Indian Sub-Continent, including the High-Intensityinsured.
Indonesia and Muzaffarabad quakes, has rekindledToday there exist many earthquake protection
fears at the highest echelons and many initiativestechnologies which efficiently and effectively
are being revived. The Prime Minister, Dr.protect structures against earthquakes i.e.
Manmohan Singh himself, chairs the Nationaldampers or energy disasters. These devices are
Disaster Management Authority. President, Dr. APJalso the most efficient and cost effective way of
Abdul Kalam, raised the issue of "the need toprotecting buildings and have been used on many
accelerate research for forecasting earthquakes"thousands of buildings around the world. One or
to "prevent heavy damage to the people andthe other building which incorporates this
property" in his recent Independence Day speech.technology witnesses an earthquake each day.
This is testimony enough as to the seriousnessMinistry of Science and Technology is pitching in
with which the Government is assessing theits bit by funding a research project for evaluating
threat perception of increased seismic activity.the effectiveness of such devices.
With growing economic might, comes greater