Federal Emergency Management Agency Fails

In the wake of a tragedy we are often left in aas the Director of the National Preparedness
state of complete and utter shock. Especially inDivision of FEMA. He was appointed by President
events where our homes are destroyed and ourBush in 2001 to lead the United States Fire
loves one separated from us, our minds are theAdministration and served in that capacity until
furthest thing from rational or clear. The2003 when he was promoted. Former FEMA
unfortunate part about this fact is that it is indirector Michael Brown was relieved of command
times like these that a clear head is the mostin 2005 following much controversy surrounding
important thing we can have. When events suchFEMA's response performance to Hurricane
as these happen, it is our family, friends, andKatrina, which devastated the Gulf Coast of the
neighbors in our communities that often come toUnited States in August 2005. Paulison was
our aid, providing relief and support where needed.selected to temporarily replace Brown and the
When disaster hits on a broader scale, however,position has yet to be filled. (Fournier, AP 9-12-05).
and it affects entire cities, counties, and states,The responsibilities of the agency, which have also
what happens then? Enter the Federal Emergencybeen adjusted a lot, are to primarily respond to
Management Agency. Since 1979, thisUnited States disasters as declared by the
organization's efforts have played vitals roles inPresident. It works heavily with different
the lives of millions of citizens who have fallenorganizations at all governmental levels, leading and
victim to natural disasters across the nation. Withcoordinating the response effort and eventually
almost 30 years past, and five presidentsthe financial assistance for the rebuilding effort.
overseeing this agency, it has undergoneWhile much of its management powers have
reorganization and changes aimed at making it abeen relocated to the Department of Homeland
better responsive resource for the citizens of theSecurity, the agency still oversees the National
United States in times of urgent need. IronicallyFlood Insurance Program. (dhs.gov, emergency
enough, it is this reorganization, among manyresponse and preparedness, 3-11) This jumbling
things, that have caused for this organization toand exchanging of the organizational structure and
fail at its primary task of responding efficientlyresponsibilities is credited by critics as being one of
and effectively in times of national crisis.the largest reasons for the failure of the agency
One of the worst disasters in American history isduring Hurricane Katrina. (Editorial 2-16-06,
the San Francisco earthquake of 1906. AlmostColumbus Dispatch)
eight hundred citizens died and over two hundredThe arguments about the strengths and
and fifty thousand were left homeless as a resultweaknesses of FEMA as an agency are tough to
of the earthquake and its resulting damage.make for the fact that the reorganization of the
(Kernell, p.77) In the aftermath of the earthquakeagency has practically created a brand new
federal and state government officials wereorganization in comparison to the pre-9/11 FEMA.
unable to immediately communicate with SanFollowing the enormity of Hurricane Katrina and
Francisco authorities regarding the damage andthe terrible response to the destruction that
needed assistance. When word finally made itplagued the southern states, demands for
through, the disaster was on a scale nobody hadinvestigations into the slow response of FEMA and
ever seen. Mass looting and chaos eventually ledother governmental bodies including the White
the city's mayor and the state governor toHouse and the Department of Homeland Security
request President Roosevelt for assistance.were rampant. The agency's current positions,
Roosevelt's response was to use the Unitedcritics argue, leaves it with less money to fund
States Military and the American Red Cross asfederal disaster relief efforts because of
well as private party support from across theincreased spending on the fight on terrorism and
country. (Kernell, p. 78-79) The aid of thesethe agency's belonging to the Department of
institutions and people was dysfunctional andHomeland Security. Additionally, the mass
controversial, as no central direction was given forreorganization of twenty-two federal agencies into
the enormous task of coordinating all rescues,the Department of Homeland Security is often
relief and rebuilding efforts. The resulting lessoncitied by critics as a major reason for failed relief
was that in times of crisis, local governments whoefforts during Katrina.
are also often rendered inoperable, have a seriousFormer FEMA Director Michael Brown has been
need for national support in most all aspects ofcastigated for his agency's failure to respond
response. Over the next sixty years, variouscompetently to the Gulf Coast disaster, but The
measures were taken to implement programsPost's investigation showed that he had been
and response plans into national governmentbitterly protesting for two years about the
entities in preparation for another major disaster.shifting of some of FEMA's responsibility to other
Multiple organizations were setup to be responsiveagencies in the reorganization. In a September
to specific aspects of need. (fema.gov, history 32003 memo to then-Homeland Security Secretary
11) Although doing much better in comparison toTom Ridge, Brown wrote that moving some of
the 1906 San Francisco earthquake, the federalFEMA's emergency-preparedness functions
government's involvement was still inefficient inelsewhere would "shatter agency morale" and
disaster times. In 1979, the National Governor's"break longstanding, effective and tested
Association urged President Jimmy Carter torelationships with states and first-responder
centralize the leadership of the various federalstakeholders" and could result in "an ineffective
organizations and programs involved in emergencyand uncoordinated response" to a disaster.
response. (fema.gov, history 3/11) President-Editorial 2-16-06, Columbus Dispatch
Carter's response was Executive Order 12148.A major strength of the organization lies in its
This order created the Federal Emergencyrecognition with the citizens of the United States.
Management Agency (FEMA) and effectivelyIts well-known responsibilities given its enormous
consolidated the leadership of the Federalwork in the last 26 years have elevated the
Insurance Administration, the National Fireagency to a position of leadership in times of a
Prevention and Control Administration, the Nationaldisaster crisis. Thus, the coordinating and
Weather Service Community Preparednessmanagement of smaller agencies, governments,
Program, the Federal Preparedness Agency ofand private companies during such times is
the General Services Administration and thebeginning to move smoother and for that reason.
Federal Disaster Assistance AdministrationWell the debate on the topic of FEMA's strengths
activities from Housing and Urban Development.and weaknesses is never-ending, one thing is
Additionally it would oversee army responsibilitiesclear; this agency is a relatively young one that is
transferred from the Defense Department'sstill experiencing growing pains and figuring out
Defense Civil Preparedness Agency. (fema.govhow to operate among mass changes and in
history 3/11) FEMA's abilities were tested shortlyprimarily chaotic times.
after its creation with various smaller-scaleVery clearly this organization is failing. Hurricane
situations and the agency's inception proved to beKatrina is one of the largest disasters in our
beneficial. Although kinks in the organization werenation's history. Like the earthquake of 1906,
still being worked out, a sense of order seemedvictims of that disaster were left stranded, by
to be brought to the local governments of areasthemselves, in complete and utter shock. The
fallen victim to disasters. (fema.gov, history 3/11).prevailing opinion is that FEMA's response to the
Approximately ten years after its creation, FEMAdisaster was nothing close to what it should or
faced its first large-scale natural disaster, ironicallycould have been. The real question is why is this
enough, in San Francisco. "The 1989 San Franciscoorganization failing? Evidence of streamlined
earthquake snapped sections of the Sanoperations and ever-increasing performance
Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge. The disasterquality was making itself apparent in the early 90's
triggered massive federal assistance and efficientand President Clinton's action of bringing the
disaster relief efforts, in stark contrast to theagency to cabinet level only helped that process
failures of volunteerism and state efforts somove forward. The response of FEMA to the
evident in 1906." (Kernell, p. 79) This tribute toterrorist attack of 9/11 was within minutes of the
efficiency and organization is largely as a result offirst plane striking the tower. It played the major
FEMA and the efforts coordinated under itsrole in the distribution of the almost all of the
leadership and training. Only two months prior toraised funds. However, the new directive of
the earthquake FEMA had conducted a trainingPresident Bush to reorganize FEMA under the new
exercise for emergency response andDHS has proven to be the cause for failure as it
government officials in relation to such anhas not been since before the agency's existence
earthquake scenario. (Kernell, p 78). This isthat we have seen such a failed federal response
evidence of a successful direction of theto a large-scale natural disaster. Predictions of the
organization shortly after its implementation and areorganization's implication on FEMA's performance
far superior response comparatively to the 1906were made when former director Brown first
quake. The direction of FEMA following the 89'heard of the plan. According to The Washington
earthquake was towards building on the alreadyPost's investigation, Brown shouted these
demonstrated strengths of the organization, aconcerns at the top of his lungs for months prior
valuable asset to this country.to Katrina. Once Hurricane Katrina happened, the
Despite its relatively short existence, FEMA'sfederal government even ignored offers to help
structure has had a rollercoaster history. Its initialthere were so disorganized (Editorial, Chicago
establishment as an independent regulatoryTribune) It is unfortunate that this consolidation
agency was eventually elevated to cabinet-levelattempt is so seriously impacting the performance
leadership by President Clinton, only to beof the organization and the outcry for its
reorganized as an agency under the newreestablishment as its own agency needs to be
Department of Homeland Security by currentconsidered immediately.
President George W. Bush in response to theWorks Cited
terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001 in hisEditorial Board. "Daley 'Shocked' At Federal Snub
Emergency Preparedness and Responseof Offers to Help." Chicago Tribune 2 Sept. 2005.
Directorate. (dhs.gov, emergencies and disasters,ProQuest. UMD Library, Duluth, MN. 11 Mar. 2006.
3-11) The current organization of the agencyEditorial Board. "Fix What's Broken; Post-Hurricane
carries a Director (the Under-Secretary), fourReports Make Clear That Homeland Security's
divisions, fourteen offices, and ten regions.FEMA Setup Doesn't Work." Columbus Dispatch 16
(fema.gov, structure 3-11). The Director position isFeb. 2006. ProQuest. UMD Library, Duluth, MN. 11
currently vacant but acting Director is RobertMar. 2006.
David Paulison, who reports directly to the"Emergencies & Disasters." Department of
Secretary of Homeland Security Michael Chertoff.Homeland Security. 11 Mar. 2006.
The four divisions, which the agency defines asFournier, Ron. "Firefighter to Replace Brown as
domains of emergency management, areFEMA Chief." Associated Press 12 Sept. 2005.
mitigation, preparedness, recovery, and response.ProQuest. UMD Library, Duluth, MN. 11 Mar. 2006.
They have very distinct roles and the heads of"History." FEMA. 11 Mar. 2006 .
these divisions report to Interim Director Paulison.Kernell, Samuel, and Jacobson Gary. The Logic of
(fema.gov, structure, 3-11) (dhs.gov, dhsAmerican Politics. 3rd ed. Washington, DC: CQ P,
organization, 3-11) Interim Director Paulison is a2006. 77-79.
Democrat from Florida who also currently serves"Structure." FEMA. 11 Mar. 2006 .