Bleach Company's "crisis Management Plan" Leaked To Greenpeace

ngoing search for case histories worthy ofdeployed to effect spin control on virtually every
mention, I came upon this now-dated pressmajor environmental issue in recent years, the
release from Greenpeace about the leak of achlorine industry has been a prolific consumer of
crisis management plan. It is a case history untothe type of service outlined in the BigName
itself, a lesson about how public relationsmemo. The Bleach PR strategy sounded familiar
professionals can create a crisis. I have changedto Stewart. "We've seen the same kinds of ploys
the names of both the national PR firm and thecoming from the American Paper Institute and
manufacturer because there is no reason thatthe Chlorine Institute surrounding the toxicity of
either, which are both still in business, should bedioxin," she said.
damaged today by a mistake made in 1991,[Lessons For Us All]
although I admit that most will figure out the* Never put anything in writing that you aren't
manufacturer's identity.willing to risk being aired in public. Sometimes that
[The Leaked Plan Press Release]means leaving messages you might actually want
Seattle, May 13, 1991 (GP) -- A public relationsto use out of a written crisis communications plan,
"Crisis Management Plan" prepared for the Bleachparticularly if (a) you don't practice very controlled
Corporation and leaked to Greenpeaceinformation security (see below) and/or (b) you're
recommends labeling environmental critics astaking an aggressive stance.
"terrorists," threatening to sue "unalterably green"* Practice information security. At the time of this
journalists, and dispatching "independent scientists"case history, faxes were still the common means
on media tours as means to counteract bad newsof rapid communication. Today, of course, it's
for the chlorine industry.email and Twitter. Draft documents, whether
The plan, prepared by the public relations divisionpaper or digital, should be shredded when no
of BigName Communications, was apparentlylonger needed; there are computer programs
prompted by fears that the environmental groupwhich can completely destroy, not just delete,
would target household use of chlorine bleach anddocuments which are no longer needed, reducing
call for its elimination.them to a state which no hacker can retrieve.
Greenpeace has an international program aimed atSensitive communications should, ideally, be
ending the use of chlorine in the pulp and paperencoded; fortunately, in my experience, most
industry. Its slogan "Chlorine-Free by 1993" is citedorganizations are unwilling to go through the
in the Bleach plan, which outlines numerous "worstprocess of teaching employees how to use email
case scenarios" in which Greenpeace andor document encoding programs, even though
"unalterably green" journalists figure prominently.many of them are extremely simple.
"They failed to anticipate the worst of worst* Consider having a contingency plan (separate
case scenarios," said Shelley Stewart, Greenpeacefrom the main plan document) for what to do if
toxics campaigner."That some conscientiousthe latter's details leak.
person would obtain the plan, and leak it to us."* Plans which are not protected by attorney
Greenpeace verified that BigNameclient privilege can be exposed through the
Communications, one of the nation's largestdisclosure process in a lawsuit, even if there is no
advertising and public relations entities, is underleak. That is why most of my crisis/issues
contract to Bleach. One portion of the leakedmanagement work is contracted directly by
document is comprised of a fax transmissionexternal or in-house legal counsel. Documents and
between two BigName offices.email then get a heading: "Privileged and
"Lying is a growth industry," Stewart said of suchConfidential. Prepared at the Request of Legal
PR firms. "The truth is that chlorine is a chemicalCounsel for the Purpose of Rendering Legal
whose days are numbered. Its use has createdAdvice." You should speak with your legal counsel
some of the most intractable environmentalto determine the best way of protecting your
problems in history."sensitive documents from disclosure.
DDT, PCBs, Agent Orange, CFCs and dioxin all* "Intelligence" is vital to a good communications
originate from use of chlorine.program. Knowing your opposition, using
Perhaps the most revealing aspect of the Bleachinformation gathered from public sources, allows
plan is that while it's clear that the companyyou to anticipate their actions and prepare
knows it has a genuine environmental problem onaccordingly. It is not difficult to look at and analyze
its hands, the document suggests that Bleachthe background and communications history of
feels more threatened by a public interest groupany organization and its leaders and, from that,
like Greenpeace than they do by the federalpredict their strengths and weaknesses with
authorities.regard to any issues-related struggle.
The Crisis Plan makes reference to studies linking* Don't assume that volunteer or "lower-salaried
chlorine use to cancer, and with remarkablethan big business" organizations have less-qualified
candor suggests ways to discredit the findings ifpublic and community relations capabilities. While I
they ever became public. BigName recommendsam usually representing the "business" side of
that Bleach should "cast doubts on theissues, I have great admiration for the public
methodology and findings," of potentially damagingrelations skills of certain environmental and other
scientific reports which haven't yet been written.activist organizations. Their PR staff would be
The PR firm also recommends labelingimmediately employable at any major agency --
Greenpeace as violent self-seekingand sometimes were employed there in the past.
"eco-terrorists;" attempting to sue newspaperSome have a vast amount of experience and, as
columnists who advocate use of non-toxicresult, have an advantage over any
bleaches and cleaners for the home; "immunizing"less-experienced opponents. To think, as some
government officials; dispatching "independent"businesses do, that organizations which oppose
scientists on media tours; and recruiting "scientifictheir goals will always be unprofessional and
ambassadors" to tout the Bleach cause and callincapable of effective PR or legal strategies is the
for further study.height of institutional arrogance.
While "crisis" public relations specialists have been